A
archive10
Guest
Hi everyone,
have been thinking for some month on ways to improve 2D reception here.
In Scandinavia (disregarding the west of Denmark), the verticals are the problem.
Even with a decent dish, the verticals still are prone to pixellation and the occasional drop-out due to rain or whatever it is.
It would (to the optimistic eye) seem that clarification of verticals would be good.
I have read with great interest that Gregorians have the beneficial trait of rectifying some of the muddling of polaristaion on a dish.
Which makes them especially good for Tx/Rx dishes.
But would that be of benefit to us vertically challenged people (polaristion-wise, that is)
Had a chat with the folks at Skyware recently. it turns out that CM180 comes in a gregorian version too.
I could make one out of one my CM180s by getting a new mount and feed assembly.
(Which would turn it from a type 180 to a type 184, I have learned!)
Would this make any difference to verticals reception on 2D, do you think?
have been thinking for some month on ways to improve 2D reception here.
In Scandinavia (disregarding the west of Denmark), the verticals are the problem.
Even with a decent dish, the verticals still are prone to pixellation and the occasional drop-out due to rain or whatever it is.
It would (to the optimistic eye) seem that clarification of verticals would be good.
I have read with great interest that Gregorians have the beneficial trait of rectifying some of the muddling of polaristaion on a dish.
Which makes them especially good for Tx/Rx dishes.
But would that be of benefit to us vertically challenged people (polaristion-wise, that is)
Had a chat with the folks at Skyware recently. it turns out that CM180 comes in a gregorian version too.
I could make one out of one my CM180s by getting a new mount and feed assembly.
(Which would turn it from a type 180 to a type 184, I have learned!)
Would this make any difference to verticals reception on 2D, do you think?