LNB Comparison - Swedish Microwave WR75 & Various C120 LNB's

moonbase

Small Dish Man
Joined
Mar 29, 2004
Messages
4,370
Reaction score
4,470
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
.
My Location
UK
I have a collection of old WR75 flange Ku-Band LNB's amongst a pile of satellite junk accumulated over several decades. Before I disposed of them I thought it might be interesting to compare the performance with a few less ancient C120 LNB's. The only full band WR75 LNB's was a Swedish Microwave WDL Type E model with LOF of 9.75/10.600 GHz. This was the WR75 LNB used for the test.

I have attached a few pictures below of the hardware setup and a chart with data table presenting one section of the scan results. The scans were done using a Precision 2.0m dish.

Despite its age, the Swedish Microwave LNB held its own against various Invacom and Inverto C120 LNB's.
 

Attachments

  • 0.8W SMW vs C120 HighV.jpg
    0.8W SMW vs C120 HighV.jpg
    325.3 KB · Views: 66
  • SMW WDL Type E LNB (WR75 Flange) p1.jpg
    SMW WDL Type E LNB (WR75 Flange) p1.jpg
    407.3 KB · Views: 58
  • SMW WDL Type E LNB (WR75 Flange) p2.jpg
    SMW WDL Type E LNB (WR75 Flange) p2.jpg
    547.7 KB · Views: 43
  • Precision ADP11SP (UBR120 Flange) p2.jpg
    Precision ADP11SP (UBR120 Flange) p2.jpg
    297.9 KB · Views: 41
  • Precision ADP11SP (UBR120 Flange) p1.jpg
    Precision ADP11SP (UBR120 Flange) p1.jpg
    303.4 KB · Views: 54
  • SMW WDL Type E LNB (WR75 Flange) p3.jpg
    SMW WDL Type E LNB (WR75 Flange) p3.jpg
    410.6 KB · Views: 97

Channel Hopper

Suffering fools, so you don't have to.
Staff member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
35,536
Reaction score
8,554
Points
113
Age
59
Website
www.sat-elite.uk
My Satellite Setup
A little less analogue, and a lot more crap.
My Location
UK
I have a collection of old WR75 flange Ku-Band LNB's amongst a pile of satellite junk accumulated over several decades. Before I disposed of them I thought it might be interesting to compare the performance with a few less ancient C120 LNB's. The only full band WR75 LNB's was a Swedish Microwave WDL Type E model with LOF of 9.75/10.600 GHz. This was the WR75 LNB used for the test.

All my experiments and background with flanged wideband stuff has been 10.75 or beyond. Spent some time with Uniden and MTI coming up with a suitable band switching fix for their 7007 receivers, it was a long time ago.
 

moonbase

Small Dish Man
Joined
Mar 29, 2004
Messages
4,370
Reaction score
4,470
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
.
My Location
UK
@Channel Hopper

That is a nice pair of WR75 LNB's, have you tested them recently to see if they still work? They would look good on the Ku ports of a Bullseye type feed for a dual C/Ku setup.

I assume the "Super California" brand was either a predecessor or a successor to the "CalAmp" brand?
 

RimaNTSS

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
5,601
Reaction score
6,079
Points
113
Age
58
My Satellite Setup
Some SAT-related hardware.
My Location
N-E from Riga
@moonbase if you wish to enlarge your collection of LNBs, you can have couple of those. Just pay shipping.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20190707_115159 (Large).jpg
    IMG_20190707_115159 (Large).jpg
    329.2 KB · Views: 101

moonbase

Small Dish Man
Joined
Mar 29, 2004
Messages
4,370
Reaction score
4,470
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
.
My Location
UK
@moonbase if you wish to enlarge your collection of LNBs, you can have couple of those. Just pay shipping.


Thank you for your kind offer, however, I am in the reverse process, I hope to reduce my collection of satellite equipment. If I do not reduce and I carry on increasing I will need larger sheds :)
 

moonbase

Small Dish Man
Joined
Mar 29, 2004
Messages
4,370
Reaction score
4,470
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
.
My Location
UK
Continuing on with the scan results for the various LNB's I have attached two more pictures below. The first picture is the chart for high band Horizontal polarity (yesterdays chart was Vertical polarity). The second picture is a feeble attempt to analyse the H and V high band scan results.

In the analysis table I took the mean (average) of the signal levels for the 4 x LNB's per frequency and then calculated the deviation from the mean per frequency and LNB. Finally, in the bottom row of the table is the average of the deviation from the means per LNB.


Conclusions:
1. All LNB's performed to about the same level, there was very little difference.
2. The test was a waste of time, the Precision 2.0m dish is too large and gathers too much signal from 0.8 West to show any weakness in the LNB's
3. If I decide to waste ony more time on this half baked project I need to use a smaller dish on a more fringe satellite.

:-ohmy
 

Attachments

  • 0.8W SMW vs C120 HighH.jpg
    0.8W SMW vs C120 HighH.jpg
    341 KB · Views: 89
  • 00.8W_20190706.jpg
    00.8W_20190706.jpg
    444.4 KB · Views: 58

John

Enthusiast.
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
3,726
Reaction score
5,528
Points
113
Location
North Nottinghamshire.
My Satellite Setup
Elite 2.2 PF - CM1.8 - CM1.2 - Gibertini 1.25.
Ku - Ka -C & Ext C.
PC cards-TM5402 receivers.
Promax FSM.
My Location
North Nottinghamshire.
Continuing on with the scan results for the various LNB's I have attached two more pictures below. The first picture is the chart for high band Horizontal polarity (yesterdays chart was Vertical polarity). The second picture is a feeble attempt to analyse the H and V high band scan results.

In the analysis table I took the mean (average) of the signal levels for the 4 x LNB's per frequency and then calculated the deviation from the mean per frequency and LNB. Finally, in the bottom row of the table is the average of the deviation from the means per LNB.


Conclusions:
1. All LNB's performed to about the same level, there was very little difference.
2. The test was a waste of time, the Precision 2.0m dish is too large and gathers too much signal from 0.8 West to show any weakness in the LNB's
3. If I decide to waste ony more time on this half baked project I need to use a smaller dish on a more fringe satellite.

:-ohmy





BUT , - Practice makes Perfect :Y:p
 

moonbase

Small Dish Man
Joined
Mar 29, 2004
Messages
4,370
Reaction score
4,470
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
.
My Location
UK
@moonbase if you wish to enlarge your collection of LNBs, you can have couple of those. Just pay shipping.



@RimaNTSS

Would you please be able to check if you have any WR75 flange LNB's in your box that cover the 13.40 to 13.65 GHz frequency range? I would enlarge my collection for one of those.
 

RimaNTSS

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
5,601
Reaction score
6,079
Points
113
Age
58
My Satellite Setup
Some SAT-related hardware.
My Location
N-E from Riga
Will look iņ the box when be at home... Friday
 

moonbase

Small Dish Man
Joined
Mar 29, 2004
Messages
4,370
Reaction score
4,470
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
.
My Location
UK
Will look iņ the box when be at home... Friday


Thank you, even if the LNB does not indicate the 13.40 to 13.65 GHz range, if there are any with L.O. of 11.475 I would have one of those.
 

Channel Hopper

Suffering fools, so you don't have to.
Staff member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
35,536
Reaction score
8,554
Points
113
Age
59
Website
www.sat-elite.uk
My Satellite Setup
A little less analogue, and a lot more crap.
My Location
UK
@RimaNTSS

Would you please be able to check if you have any WR75 flange LNB's in your box that cover the 13.40 to 13.65 GHz frequency range? I would enlarge my collection for one of those.

WR75 is a specification with dimensions of 3/4 inch and 3/8 inch. I can't recall the max/min pass but it is about 8-15.5GHz.

The transmit port on a Ku band BUC/ODU is at the upper limit of the frequencies but still shares the same dimensions of the WR75 specification.
For reception that covers the upper frequency it might be worth looking at a mechanical band pass filter (of which I have some), or sleeving down the internal throat of the feed using thin aluminium. Something akin to a Chinese takeaway carton works well.

I would aim for around 0.7 of an inch (or a shade over 17.5mm in new currency)
 

moonbase

Small Dish Man
Joined
Mar 29, 2004
Messages
4,370
Reaction score
4,470
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
.
My Location
UK
WR75 is a specification with dimensions of 3/4 inch and 3/8 inch. I can't recall the max/min pass but it is about 8-15.5GHz.

The transmit port on a Ku band BUC/ODU is at the upper limit of the frequencies but still shares the same dimensions of the WR75 specification.
For reception that covers the upper frequency it might be worth looking at a mechanical band pass filter (of which I have some), or sleeving down the internal throat of the feed using thin aluminium. Something akin to a Chinese takeaway carton works well.

I would aim for around 0.7 of an inch (or a shade over 17.5mm in new currency)


Subject to being in posession of a suitable LNB, if the new Amos satellite has any signals receivable in the UK in the 13.40 to 13.65 GHz range I will try a beef madras carton on it, I aint that fussed about Chinese. If the beef madras dont sort it then it's game over.
 
Last edited:

Channel Hopper

Suffering fools, so you don't have to.
Staff member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
35,536
Reaction score
8,554
Points
113
Age
59
Website
www.sat-elite.uk
My Satellite Setup
A little less analogue, and a lot more crap.
My Location
UK
I have found a couple of LNBs from the shed (NJRC brand), the model number is 2155A which I'm almost certain is a 11.475GHz DRO type, 0.8 to 1.0 dB NF and with stability better than 1.5MHz across the band, though its been a long time since I checked the charts.

I can see a couple of Echostar branded ones in the deep recesses (ooooerrrr !), which I can only get to on Saturday, the NECs might be nearby.20190710_153243.jpg20190710_153320.jpg
 

moonbase

Small Dish Man
Joined
Mar 29, 2004
Messages
4,370
Reaction score
4,470
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
.
My Location
UK
I have found a couple of LNBs from the shed (NJRC brand), the model number is 2155A which I'm almost certain is a 11.475GHz DRO type, 0.8 to 1.0 dB NF and with stability better than 1.5MHz across the band, though its been a long time since I checked the charts.

I can see a couple of Echostar branded ones in the deep recesses (ooooerrrr !), which I can only get to on Saturday, the NECs might be nearby.View attachment 125374View attachment 125375



Interesting pics, those old LNB's are built like panzer artillery shells.


I had a hunt around various boxes in the loft and the highest range I found was an old ComStream LNB with range of 12.25 to 12.75. There is no LO indicated on it so I assume it may be 11.30 GHz? It had some type of additional component attached to the WR775 port that I have never seen before, any ideas what it may be, is it a band pass filter?


ComStream p1.jpg


ComStream p2.jpg
 

s-band

Specialist Contributor
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
1,843
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
1.5m IRTE PF, Octagon OSLO external Ref., TBS6983,
Various L, S, C, X & Ka bits. 1.2m S/X/Ku/Ka Prodelin on Az-El (being refurbished)
My Location
Essex
Interesting pics, those old LNB's are built like panzer artillery shells.


I had a hunt around various boxes in the loft and the highest range I found was an old ComStream LNB with range of 12.25 to 12.75. There is no LO indicated on it so I assume it may be 11.30 GHz? It had some type of additional component attached to the WR775 port that I have never seen before, any ideas what it may be, is it a band pass filter?
Looks like an isolator (Used to improve the match seen by things on each side). They normally have <0.3dB loss but can improve things more than that with the better match.
 

Channel Hopper

Suffering fools, so you don't have to.
Staff member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
35,536
Reaction score
8,554
Points
113
Age
59
Website
www.sat-elite.uk
My Satellite Setup
A little less analogue, and a lot more crap.
My Location
UK
Interesting pics, those old LNB's are built like panzer artillery shells.


I had a hunt around various boxes in the loft and the highest range I found was an old ComStream LNB with range of 12.25 to 12.75. There is no LO indicated on it so I assume it may be 11.30 GHz? It had some type of additional component attached to the WR775 port that I have never seen before, any ideas what it may be, is it a band pass filter?


View attachment 125377


View attachment 125378

If it is rated at 12.25 GHz upwards then the LNB will have a 11.3 puck inside.
Comstream was part of Radyne at some point, perhaps that helps identify what the bolt on part is
 

Channel Hopper

Suffering fools, so you don't have to.
Staff member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
35,536
Reaction score
8,554
Points
113
Age
59
Website
www.sat-elite.uk
My Satellite Setup
A little less analogue, and a lot more crap.
My Location
UK
Rats!

The NJRC LNBs might not be 11.475 after all, I can't find any specification of them online, the nearest chart shows other models, including the 2154 (all variants) locked to 11.30 GHz.


I don't think New Japan used pucks either, preferring a crystal for the stability (which might have the ability to be exchanged for another frequency)

I will run one up in a few minutes.
 

Channel Hopper

Suffering fools, so you don't have to.
Staff member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
35,536
Reaction score
8,554
Points
113
Age
59
Website
www.sat-elite.uk
My Satellite Setup
A little less analogue, and a lot more crap.
My Location
UK
Hotbird frequencies from the analyser.

11861 V Piatta , normally 12558
11898 V Global, normally 12591
11940 V Sky 13E, normally 12635

Which makes a difference of about 700 MHz up from the Universal high band of 10600, or 11.300 GHz

Rats confirmed ! Will strip off in a moment.
 

Channel Hopper

Suffering fools, so you don't have to.
Staff member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
35,536
Reaction score
8,554
Points
113
Age
59
Website
www.sat-elite.uk
My Satellite Setup
A little less analogue, and a lot more crap.
My Location
UK
Looks like a VCXO crystal on the side, but only two pins are soldered to the PCB (1 - V.C and 14 - Vdd) ?

IMG_7833.JPGIMG_7834.JPGIMG_7835.JPGIMG_7837.JPGIMG_7839.JPG
 
Top