bigtee
Regular Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2006
- Messages
- 469
- Reaction score
- 22
- Points
- 18
- Age
- 38
- My Satellite Setup
- Sky; Raven 90 multi-LNB 1W,5E, 7E, 9E, 13E 16E, 19E, 28E; 60cm Triax dish on Moteck SG2100 motor; Various Receivers
- My Location
- Kent, UK
Nah, the decision doesn't particularly bother me one way or another whichever way it goes. All I have been doing is to provide some clarification on the accurate position of the law to help people make informed judgments on where they stand. Also, I have felt it necessary to provide a balance when I notice a pro Sly/provider slant that (a) does not accurately portray the law and/or (b) pay sufficient attention to the other side of the coin i.e. the consumer's perspective. That is why I pointed out some of the absurdities (e.g. Chelsea v Inter example) resulting from the Murphy decision as things stand currently.
What the minister said is not the law; in fact if you look at it closely it is not even totally accurate in law. However, one thing it does is to give an insight into what the legislature aimed to achieve.
What the minister said is not the law; in fact if you look at it closely it is not even totally accurate in law. However, one thing it does is to give an insight into what the legislature aimed to achieve.