Advice Needed Receivers with the lowest Symbol Rate?

SF 8008 tune and lock SR 480

1_0_1_2_FB4_0_0_0_0_0_20231228200526.jpg

1_0_2_1_0_0_C4D8EFA_0_0_0_20231228200733.jpg

screenshot_20231228200708.jpg


osmini4k, no signal:

screenshot_20231228201307.jpg

I think limit for osmini4k is until SR 500
 
Last edited:
Anyhow this is better than before. How about the radio IP feeds on 30W?
 
Is there a possibility of integrating these driver modifications into a downloadable image for the Edision OS MIO?
 
Today traveled to my "summer cottage" where I have Vu+ Zero 4K. Quite a lot of snow here in Finland btw.

Took me only about 5 minutes to patch the driver binary for 10492H and it's working. Interesting because Vu+ Zero4k has Silabs tuner.

But I guess it's the same as Vu+ Uno4K, this device has problem with low symbolrate.

vuzero4k_10492H.jpg
 
And a silabs tuner where they deactivated the SNR in db. Their psychotic mentality....
 
The Ocean 04 improvements work perfectly with the TNAP-5 image from El bandido
with a universal LNB 10492 is received,
non-locked signals are indicated
SRs below 1000 are now received (I don't yet know where the lower limit is, maybe 500)
tnap5 modif 10492b.jpgtnap5 modif 11604nolock.jpgtnap5 modif sr789.jpg
 
stephan94 said:
The Ocean 04 improvements work perfectly with the TNAP-5 image from El bandido
with a universal LNB 10492 is received,
non-locked signals are indicated
SRs below 1000 are now received (I don't yet know where the lower limit is, maybe 500)
View attachment 153645
Click to expand...


@stephan94

Is that the default skin from the TNAP image that you are using in the 10492 H screen capture?
Or is it another skin?

Thank you.
 
moonbase said:
@stephan94

Is that the default skin from the TNAP image that you are using in the 10492 H screen capture?
Or is it another skin?

Thank you.
Click to expand...
No, it is CinoGriPLi modified a bit
 
MCelliotG said:
Anyhow this is better than before. How about the radio IP feeds on 30W?
Click to expand...
Test in EDISION OSmio+ 4K:
capture_010_30122023_150809.pngcapture_011_30122023_151041.png
Original KO from TNAP ( SR-718 ok , SR-512 no)
capture_002_30122023_123523.png
Original KO from OpenViX (SR-718 no , SR-512 no)
capture_005_30122023_124002.png
Patch from 24.12 (SR-718 ok , SR-512 no)
capture_007_30122023_124805.png
Patch from 26.12 (show lock, but it is the previous transponder)
capture_006_30122023_124401.png
Patch from 27.12 (show lock, but it is the previous transponder)
capture_008_30122023_125240.png
Patch from 27.12 (SR-718 ok , SR-512 no)
capture_009_30122023_150324.png
 
Last edited:
suedschwede said:
e2_changes_20231223.diff getestet im OpenATV7.4 with SF8008, Signal just above zero is displayed :)
Click to expand...
Does that really work in SF8008 and OpenATV? Have you tested other transponders? In OpenVix SF8008 I'm getting nothing
 
Damn, I only have my Mutant HD51 with me at my hometown... I really wanna see these differences.
Did Stephan mentioned that 10492 is now received with a regular LNB? Did I read correctly?
 
MCelliotG said:
10492 is now received with a regular LNB?
Click to expand...
Yes, possible with Edision + avl6261. What are the models using this tuner?
10492H also works with Vu+uno4k and Vu+zero4k using patched driver binary. I assume it's possible to patch all Vu+ 4K models.
So far unable to get it working in sf4008, sf8008, gbtrio, (these are all models I currently have)
 
@ocean04 - is it possible to do "patching" for non-locked signals indication for sf4008 ?
Patches at #274 post are propably just for sf8008 ? Do I understand that you have to change only a few lines in 2 files or you have to build the whole image in linux env from the scratch?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top