I've never seen a new SES sat being on hold for so long.
I agree that Ka tps should have been tested by now.
Also,if the delay is because of other sat movements in the fleet,as suggested,I'd be surprised that for once Murdoch is denied priority..
Is there a limit to how "lazily" a satellite can go without causing a traffic jam? What if someone else wants to shift a satellite in the mean time? I wonder if there are speed limits near the Clarke belt?
Is there a limit to how "lazily" a satellite can go without causing a traffic jam? What if someone else wants to shift a satellite in the mean time? I wonder if there are speed limits near the Clarke belt?

Under ITU rules there is a minimum amount that you have to raise/lower the orbit, so that it doesn't interfere with static geosats.If they're really going to wait until next year to start transmission then I don't understand why they don't send it on a lazy path now thus saving fuel.
I've got that in one of my pictures too, but can't detect the fainter one. Obviously going east/west 100% in sync with the earth's rotation.Below the traktor-beam is another funny creature, it always appears in the same position slowly going north. A bright object always followed by a fainter one next to it.
Most likely tests that we don't have the equipment to monitor.there still must be a reason they're not despatching it now at the slowest allowable pace.
Most likely tests that we don't have the equipment to monitor.
I've got that in one of my pictures too, but can't detect the fainter one. Obviously going east/west 100% in sync with the earth's rotation.
